Ann Gleig and Brenna Artinger

‘One major category of anti-social justice Buddhists are those who claim to be apolitical while attacking left-wing positions often from a right-wing political perspective. We find Aaron Huertas’ s category of “reactionary centrism” useful here. Huertas defines a reactionary centrist as “someone who says they’re politically neutral, but who usually punches left while sympathizing with the right.” He describes reactionary centrism as an ideology that draws false equivalences between right- and left-wing positions in order to situate itself as the reasonable, balanced, and neutral center view. We align reactionary centrism with what we call “performative transcendence,” in which Buddhist practitioners denounce social justice initiatives while denying the social power imbalances such initiatives aim to address under the guise of a non-dual “no preferences” perspective. Performative transcendence functions, therefore, to simultaneously naturalize dominant social power hierarchies while marking challenges to such hierarchies political. Practitioners who engage in reactionary centrism or performative transcendence de-legitimate DEI Buddhist expressions as political rather than Buddhist and naturalize their own religio-political positions as Buddhist rather than political.

In the American context, the modern concept of the Buddha as an Aryan linked him racially and linguistically to Euro-Americans and helped fashion Buddhism as a scientific religion suitable for white converts. Joseph Cheah traces white supremacy in American convert Buddhism to this modernist racial articulation of Buddhism, which also rests on a distinction between an original “pure” canonical Buddhism and the latter cultural accretions of “superstitious” merit-making and ritual practices. Cheah traces how in the American context this resulted in the “two Buddhisms” typology, which positions white American convert Buddhists as practicing “real” Buddhism and Asian American heritage communities as practicing “cultural baggage” Buddhism.’ (from The Journal of Global BuddhismI have taken out the reference notes from the original)

Obviously I am rather late to the game on this, but while I have been under the weather the past few days, I followed up on some threads, and was reading around this subject. I feel that it would be helpful that I restate my agreement with this expression and understanding, rather than taking my sympathy as understood. The next few Saturdays will also feature posts in this realm, intended to help other white folks investigate how these issues impact our life and our practice.

Responses

  1. Shonen Avatar

    I would encourage you to download the pdf book called Broken Buddha by S. Dhammika. Having spent considerable time in Burmese and Thai Theravadan monasteries, I have first hand experience of how dry, formalized and unfortunately, corrupt the practice of Buddhism has become in these countries and a lot of it is culturally driven. Not everywhere to be sure, but widespread enough to be troubling. So this is a tricky and thorny issue and not as black and white as Cheah would have us believe. One good starting point for discussion would be to examine the role and treatment of women – I wonder what Cheah has to say on that. I have little experience with Asian American heritage communities so cannot comment on how they differ from the lay communities in Burma & Thailand for example, but sincerely hope that they do.

    For me, the important thing is tackling the 3 poisons: greed, hate and delusion and I personally don’t care if someone is a white convert Buddhist or practicing in a heritage community. If their practice is lessening the grip of these then that’s what counts. The thing that concerned me most about practicing in Thailand is that the lay people there believed that meditation was just for the monks and they were basically brainwashed into a merit based practice. I’m not convinced this approach will get the job done. I have no idea the extent to which this belief has carried over to heritage communities in the West. During an 8 month stint in a monastery near Bangkok, I was frequently asked why I didn’t take temporary ordination. My reply was that I wanted to show that lay people can, do and should meditate.

    Like

    1. shundo Avatar

      Thank you for the recommendation and for sharing your experience of practice. I have not practised in Asia, so obviously have a limited view on what is done there 🙏🏼

      Like

Leave a comment