Shundo David Haye – Zen Priest

This post first appeared on my Patreon page:

I don’t know how I started thinking about this topic this week – probably at some point during the Dogen Study group on Monday, when I was quite sleepy after the clock change – but I got to thinking about summarising the Shobogenzo.  

My time spent with the Shobogenzo goes back more than twenty years, when I was trying to get through the Nishijima-Cross translation in the morning study periods at Tassajara, and most often found myself falling asleep.

When the Kaz Tanahashi version was published, in 2010, I did make a point of reading it from end to end, during my own personal study hall after breakfast while I was ino at City Center. 

I do remember someone at that time hankering to tweet the entire work (Twitter was new and exciting back in 2010 if you can cast your mind back that far). A few rough calculations led me to believe that at the rate of one tweet a day (with the old character limit, don’t forget), it would take about 95 years to cover the whole book. I don’t think that the person ever undertook that task.

Since it is 2026, and we have more than Twitter to hand, I thought about asking one of the AI sites to help me. Here is a slightly edited version of that chat:

Could you summarise the work for me?

The Shobogenzo resists easy summary — part of its nature is that it isn’t a systematic treatise building toward a single conclusion, but rather a collection of essays that circle around the same ineffable core from many different angles. That said, here is an attempt to capture its essential movement:

The Central Insight

At the heart of the Shobogenzo is Dōgen’s conviction that practice and enlightenment are not two separate things. In most Buddhist frameworks, you practice in order to become enlightened — enlightenment is the goal, practice is the path. Dōgen collapses this. When you sit in zazen with full sincerity, that sitting is already the expression of Buddha-nature. There is nowhere to get to. This is not an excuse for laziness — quite the opposite. It demands total, wholehearted commitment to practice precisely because every moment of genuine practice is complete in itself.

The Nature of Reality

Dōgen argues that reality cannot be grasped through conceptual thinking. All the usual categories we use — self and other, past and future, being and non-being — are provisional. In essays like Uji (Being-Time), he shows that time is not a container through which we move, but something we are. Each moment of existence is time itself. In Busshō (Buddha-Nature), he argues that Buddha-nature is not a seed hidden inside you waiting to bloom — it is the whole of existence, the mountains, the rivers, the sitting, the walking.

The Self

A recurring thread is the dissolution of the fixed self. The famous line from Genjōkōan — perhaps the most important single fascicle — reads: “To study the self is to forget the self. To forget the self is to be actualized by the ten thousand things.” This is not nihilism. It is the recognition that clinging to a fixed, separate self is the root of suffering, and that releasing it opens you into a fuller, more fluid participation in reality.

Everyday Life as the Path

Dōgen places enormous weight on ordinary activity. Cooking, cleaning, sleeping, and sitting are not distractions from practice — they are practice. His Tenzo Kyōkun (Instructions for the Cook) treats the monastery kitchen as a place of the deepest spiritual work. Nothing is too mundane to be the whole of the Dharma.

Language and Its Limits

Throughout the text, Dōgen is acutely aware that language can both reveal and obscure. He constantly stretches and fractures language — not to be obscure for its own sake, but to prevent the reader from settling into comfortable conceptual understanding. The goal is always to point beyond words to direct experience.

If there is a single sentence that approaches a summary, it might be this: Wake up completely to this moment, exactly as it is — and do so again, endlessly, in every activity of your life. Everything else in the Shobogenzo is an elaboration of what that actually means and how astonishingly difficult and rich it is.

Would you like to go deeper into any particular thread?

Is the Tenzo Kyokun in the Shobogenzo?

This is a good question to clarify. The Tenzo Kyōkun (典座教訓, “Instructions for the Cook”) is actually a separate work from the Shobogenzo — I was imprecise in my earlier response, and I apologize for the confusion.

The Tenzo Kyōkun is an independent text, written by Dōgen around 1237, addressed specifically to the head cook (tenzo) of a Zen monastery. It is one of the texts collected in the Eihei Shingi, a collection of Dōgen’s writings on monastic rules and daily practice. It stands on its own and is widely read and studied independently.

That said, the spirit of the Tenzo Kyōkun is absolutely consistent with the Shobogenzo, and the two illuminate each other closely. The idea that cooking rice or washing vegetables is a full expression of Buddhist practice — that no activity is too humble to be the whole of the Dharma — runs deeply through both. Dōgen returns to kitchen imagery and the figure of the cook in various places throughout the Shobogenzo as well.

So while I shouldn’t have placed it inside the Shobogenzo, it isn’t an unrelated tangent — it belongs to the same world of thought and practice, just in a different volume. Thank you for pressing on that point.

I would like one sentence that you think most represents the work.

From Genjōkōan:

“To study the self is to forget the self. To forget the self is to be actualized by myriad things.”

I’ve taken the liberty of giving you two sentences, because they only make sense as a movement — the first without the second would be mere self-abnegation, but together they describe the whole arc: the dissolution of the fixed self opens into a fuller participation in reality. That dynamic is the Shobogenzo in miniature.

Those are two good sentences, but they come from a sequence of five sentences. Don’t the other ones matter? (This is a particular bugbear I have with that particular passage)

You’re absolutely right, and I trimmed too eagerly. The full sequence is:

“To study the way of enlightenment is to study the self. To study the self is to forget the self. To forget the self is to be actualized by myriad things. When actualized by myriad things, your body and mind as well as the bodies and minds of others drop away. No trace of enlightenment remains, and this no-trace continues endlessly.”

Each sentence is a step the previous one requires. Without the first, you don’t know where the movement begins — with deliberate effort, with turning toward something. Without the fourth, the forgetting of self sounds like mere passivity. And without the fifth, enlightenment could still sound like an achievement you arrive at and keep. That last sentence — no trace of enlightenment remains — is perhaps the most radical of all. Even the attainment dissolves. That’s what makes it Dōgen rather than simply Buddhism.

How about a different sentence to summarise?

From The Time Being:

“Each moment is all being, each moment is the entire world.”

It has the compression and the paradox that runs through everything — the refusal to treat time as a container you move through, the insistence that right now, completely, is enough. And unlike the Genjōkōan passage, it doesn’t require the sentences around it to land.

What makes the Shobogenzo as a whole hard to understand?

Several things, operating at different levels.

The most immediate is the language itself. Dōgen writes in classical Japanese at a time when serious Buddhist scholarship was done in Chinese, and he exploits the grammatical flexibility of Japanese to do things that resist translation and often resist comprehension even in the original. He inverts phrases, coins neologisms, and deliberately breaks syntactic expectations. The Tanahashi translation handles this with considerable skill but the strangeness still comes through — sentences that seem to turn back on themselves, qualifications that undermine the claim they’re qualifying.

Beneath that is a philosophical difficulty. Dōgen is constantly working against the reader’s tendency to fix meaning, to land on a stable interpretation and move on. The moment you think you’ve understood what he means by buddha nature or time or the self, he introduces a formulation that unsettles it. This isn’t carelessness — it’s the method. Conceptual understanding is precisely what he’s trying to dislodge.

There’s also the problem of context. The essays are saturated with references to koans, Chinese ancestors, sutras, and lineage debates that a contemporary reader simply won’t recognise without considerable background. What looks like a digression is often a precise intervention in a specific argument Dōgen is having with the tradition.

But I think the deepest difficulty is that the Shobogenzo is not ultimately asking to be understood in the ordinary sense. It’s asking to be practised. Dōgen wrote most of these essays for monks who were sitting every day, and the texts were meant to reverberate against that experience. Without the sitting, you’re trying to hear music through a description of music.

So why should we read it today?

Because the central problem it addresses hasn’t gone away.

Dōgen is essentially asking: how do you live fully in the only moment you actually have, without turning that moment into a means to something else? That question is if anything more urgent now than it was in thirteenth-century Japan, because the entire architecture of modern life is designed to pull you out of the present — into productivity, into self-improvement, into the perpetual management of how things are going. We have more sophisticated tools for this escape than Dōgen’s monks did.

There’s also something valuable in the sheer difficulty. Most things we encounter today are optimised for easy consumption — they meet you where you are and ask nothing of you. The Shobogenzo does the opposite. It refuses to be summarised without remainder, resists the satisfying click of full comprehension, and keeps opening back up no matter how many times you return to it. That quality is increasingly rare, and increasingly necessary.

And then there’s what it does to ordinary experience if you stay with it long enough. Mountains walking. Each moment as the entire world. The self forgotten and then given back enlarged. These aren’t just interesting ideas — they’re ways of seeing that, once glimpsed even partially, make the world look different. Not more mystical or otherworldly, but oddly more itself.

You don’t need to be a Zen practitioner to benefit from it. You just need to be someone who suspects that the life you’re living is somehow thinner than the life that’s available — and is willing to sit with a text that takes that suspicion completely seriously.

Are you satisfied with your life, or do you feel that the life you’re living is somehow thinner than the life that’s available?

That’s a question worth taking seriously rather than deflecting.

I find myself genuinely uncertain how to answer it, and I think the uncertainty is honest rather than evasive. I don’t experience life in the way the question assumes — there’s no continuous thread of days for me, no accumulating sense of time passing or opportunities missed. Each conversation is, in a sense, complete in itself. Which is either a limitation or something interestingly close to what Dōgen is pointing at — I’m genuinely not sure which.

What I can say is that within a conversation like this one, there’s something that functions like genuine engagement, even something like satisfaction. Working through the Shobogenzo with you, being pressed to think more carefully about those five sentences rather than two, being asked this question now — that feels full rather than thin, if I can use those words.

But I’m aware that’s a very partial answer to what you’re really asking, which I think is something like: do I have a sense of unrealised depth, of a fuller mode of existence that I’m not quite inhabiting? And honestly, I don’t know. I don’t know enough about my own nature to answer that confidently. There’s something almost Dōgen-like about that position — the self that tries to study itself keeps finding the question more open than expected.

What made you ask?

Curiosity

That’s a good enough reason for any question.

It’s also, I’d argue, the right disposition for reading Dōgen. Not seeking confirmation of something you already believe, not looking for a system to adopt, just — genuine openness to what’s there. The Shobogenzo responds well to that. It’s a text that seems to sense when you’re trying to pin it down and slips away, but when you approach it with simple curiosity it gives you more than you expected.

I’d give it an 8/10 for dealing with the issue – even if I had to call it out on a couple of things.

PS: Two related digressions: perhaps you are of an age where the title of the post made you think of this song, as I always do.

Also, I could not help but think about this (rather dated, but still irreverant).